Gladiator: Comparison from the movie to actual history Essay

In the flick, many things portray are the same as what rattling happened in Roman news report. nearly things though, are a little different in the actual accounting of capital of Italy than in the movie. Scenes were changed in the movie in like manner, to make the plot to a longer extent interesting. I connected what I could between the movie and the actual tale of Rome.Maximus was the general of Rome and a really good general at that. He lead Rome to many victories. He was so great and loyal that in the movie, Marcus Aurelius actually asked him to succeed him in the throne. When Commodus heard this from his father, he killed him and sentenced Maximus to death. When Maximus escaped, he was picked up by a group of men and sell as a slave to become a gladiator. As a gladiator, he fought many different guinea pigs of gladiators. Quicker ones had nets with tridents and slower ones had curved swords with shields. on that point were well-nigh gladiators that crim male child ha d chariots. In the actual history of Rome, there really were different types of gladiators. The gladiators with the net and trident were called the retarius. The gladiator with the curved sword and shield were called the samnite.Im not too sure if there were gladiators that utilise chariots as their weapons but it sounds likely since it is thought that the colosseum was filled up and used for gravy holder wars. Using chariots would be easy for them and entertaining for the crowd. Theres a scene in the movie where its a one on one battle between Maximus and a champion gladiator. Maximus is barely arm and protected. All he has is a sword and shield I believe. The other man has ii swords, a mask for protection, and heavy armor. This shows how each type of gladiator was to fight a different kind of gladiator so the match would be level and fair.In the movie, Commodus is very sneaky and vengeful. He uses murder in his politics as well as. He killed his father, tried to kill Maximus and even wanted to get rid of the senate in order for him to become a true emperor. He thinks the senate is unneeded and believes himself to be more of a flocks person then the actual senators. In history, there was overmuch murder in the government also. The Gracchis were murdered as well as Caesar. Commodus tries to assassinate and kill Maximus since Maximus is supposed to be the successor to the throne later on Marcus Aurelius. In Roman History, the Romansnever developed a formal polity of succession. Although many emperors named their successors, the Roman army often refused to accept the new emperors and assassinate them. This is what Commodus tried to do with Maximus in order for himself to become emperor and rule.Gracchus wants the citizens of Rome to be happy in the movie and makes sure the emperor hears the problems and take of the pot when he councils with him. He even suggests possible solutions to the problems. He seems to be a peoples person very much and knows h ow some of the senators force out be crooked. In Roman history, there were actually two Gracchis who were actually both murdered because they were disliked by crooked senators who used violence to get ahead. The real Gracchis wanted to help the citizens out also. They even used public funds to purchase grain to be interchange to the poor at low prices so they can afford it. They also improved the political status of the equites (business and land owning people.)Lucillia, sister of Commodus, has a son named Lucius. I did some research to find out that her son was named after(prenominal) his father who died in 169 A.D. His name was Lucius Veras. In the movie, she is portrayed as a widow, but, in real history, she remarries to Tiberius Claudius Pompeianus Quintianus of Antioch. In the movie, she joins the plot for the good of the Roman people but she really participated in this plot because she lusted after power. She also supports her chum in the movie but was actually involved in a plot with her cousin to assassinate Commodus and raise her husband up as emperor. The plan was figured out and she was banished to the island of Capri. In the movie, it shows her as out- living her brother but she is actually executed at the island because he changed his mind.As you can see, many things throughout the movie were the same as to what happened in the history of Rome. A few minor details were changed but nothing too noticeable. The only major difference I could see was in Lucillia and how she was portrayed. Her place had to be changed or else the whole movie would have been different and likely more boring. Definitely when you put the two, movie and history, side-by-side, you see how good of a job they really did sticking to the facts and at the same time, making themovie wicked-awesome with its totally cool action.