Pride and Prejudice: Literary Criticism

When asking typical child who their hero or heroine is, a common effect would be Superman, Batman, or Cat Woman. To these kids, a hero is defined as few single with extraordinary physical strength and the bra very(prenominal) to fight wholly villain, such as the Joker, without any personal benefit or reward. Although their becharm of a hero is very childish and uninformed, they are in a way correct. Although a hero may not always direct to physically battle villains, they must have emotional strength, bravery, and perseverance to traverse whatever troubles their respective villain brings forward.In the novel, reserve and blemish, author Jane Austen portrays her ingest of heroes, heroines, and villains in a satirically love stratum. Andrew H. Wright has written a literary criticism essay, titled Heroines, Heroes, and Villains in reserve and Prejudice, in which he states his opinion of Austens purpose. Although critic Andrew H. Wright states that some people are evidentl y destined to be heroes, Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen features char interpreters that are suitable of overcoming their own weaknesses that rise as heroes out-of-pocket to their own perseverance and those who intercede with a potential-heros progress deform villains. Although Andrew H.Wright devolvees this key point Austen makes, Pride and Prejudice introduces characters that are able to overcome their own flaws that rise as heroes. First off, Wright states how he believes Elizabeth to be the heroine of the story. In the root paragraph he quickly states Elizabeth is definitely the heroine not only does she explicitly represent one of the spoken language of the title of the story she quite thoroughly dominates the action (Wright 97). Wright misinterprets the cogitate that Elizabeth is a heroine. Its true that Elizabeth dominates the action throughout, though that is only a result of being the main character.By no means is her teaching as a character influenced by the nu mber of mentions she receives in the novel. On another note, Wright is incorrect in saying that Elizabeth only represents one of the words of the title of the story, as Austen intends her to represent some(prenominal). An example of this occurs when Darcy proposes to Elizabeth Elizabeths astonishment was beyond impressionhe was not more eloquent on the national of tenderness than of disdain. His sense of her inferiority-of its being a degradation-of the family obstacles (Austen 185). This quote is a icing example of how many interpret the title of Pride and Prejudice, believing that Darcy is intend to be the pride and Elizabeth is intended to be the evil. In actuality, both characters exhibit both of the traits. In observing Darcys excessive pride, Elizabeth is very prejudiced. In disgust with Darcys proposal, Elizabeth goes onto say that From the very beginning, from the very first moment I may almost say, of my acquaintance with you, your manners, impressing me with the fulles t belief of your arrogance, your c one timeit, and your self-centred disdain of the feelings of others (Austen 188).Elizabeths nasty comment about Darcy confirms that she, before flat getting to know Mr. Darcy, deems him as snobbish, showing her prejudice. Darcy is very prejudiced in making judgments on Elizabeth based on her family and wealth. An example of Darcys prejudice occurs when Elizabeth rejects his first proposal I did allthing in my power to separate my champ from your sister, or that I rejoice in my success (Austen 187). Darcy believes that by separating Mr. Bingley from Jane, he is doing what is best for his friend.It should not be Darcys concern to be relate in his friends family, and Mr. Bingley should know what is best for himself. Wright is misguided in saying that Elizabeth only represents only one of the words in the title, so making her the heroine, when Darcy and Elizabeth represent both these characteristics. Elizabeth ultimately overcomes her own flaws and is able to be happily with Darcy, yet she first had to deal with villainous characters. The villains in Pride and Prejudice disrupt a potential-heros progress, yet this is misinterpreted by Wright. erst again, Andrew H. Wright understands what the basic theme Jane Austen intends to share, but he misunderstands the reason why it is true. In his critical essay, Wright discusses George Wickham is at once the most plausible and the most villainous of Jane Austens anti-heroes he is handsome, persuasive, personable (Wright 108). Indeed, this is all true, yet not once does Wright mention why Wickham is a villain, other than the fact that Elizabeth was attracted to him.Wright ignores the fact that Wickham is a sick man because of what happened with Darcys sister. In the novel, Darcy reveals to Elizabeth in his letter Mr. Wickhams headland object was unquestionably my sisters fortune, which is thirty thousand pounds but I cannot armed service supposing that the hope of revenging himsel f on me was a strong inducement (Austen 196). Without a doubt, Wickham interferes with Elizabeths marriage with Mr. Darcy to entertain himself and bother Darcy. Elizabeths chances of realizing her inevitable love for Darcy are this delayed.It is important to note that perhaps Elizabeth expresses feelings at first for Wickhams character, exposit a handsome and personable, because of her prejudice. At Meryton, Elizabeth first observes Wickham as beyond all the other officers in person, countenance, variant, and walk (Austen 75). Elizabeth notices him to be different from the other officers, and associates him positively because he is an officer. Wickhams irresistible characteristics attract Elizabeth away from Darcy because her prejudice forces her to dismiss any chance at him being flawed upon first merging him.The final reason Wickham is a villainous character is because of his elopement with Lydia, leading to a misunderstanding between Elizabeth and Darcy. As Elizabeth tells Dar cy of her discovery of Wickham and Lydias elopement, Darcy begins walking up and down the room in earnest meditation his brow contracted, his air gloomy. Elizabeth soon observed and instantly understood it. Her power was sinking every thing must sink under such a validation of family weakness, such an assurance of the deepest disgrace. (Austen 264). Elizabeth greatly misunderstands this situation thinking that Darcy leaves because he no longer wants to be connected with the familys suddenly poor neighborly status. In actuality, Darcy is going to London to fix the situation for the Bennet family. overdue to this misunderstanding, Elizabeth assumes that Darcy is no longer interested in her. Wickhams villainous act of running off with Lydia causes great trouble for Elizabeth, separating her from Darcy and causing great annoyance about her social status.Wright only acknowledges Wickhams villainy for being enchanting and simply another relationship for Elizabeth, and not for one whi ch interrupts her inevitable relationship with Darcy. As shown in Pride and Prejudice villains are a block off force of a potential-heros progress. Even though critic Andrew H. Wright believes that some people are simply destined to be heroes, Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen features characters that are capable of overcoming their own weaknesses that rise as heroes due to their own perseverance and those who interfere with a otential-heros progress become villains. Elizabeth Bennet outlines Austens definition of a hero, as Wickham does as a villain. Through the tough times brought upon her by villains, and her own weaknesses which she must overcome, Elizabeth becomes Austens definition of a hero by overcoming her weaknesses. Her prejudice and excessive pride are the qualities which lead her to trouble and confusion in her relationship with Darcy. It is expire why Austen first titled the novel First Impressions, because as this storys heroine learns, they can be quite deceiving.