student :: essays research papers

EuthyphroGood or bad, right or wrong, truth or lie, piety or impiety, besides or unjust, honorable or degrading these controversies are and always have been problematic for human beings. It is not as easy as it seems to draw a line between those antonyms, partially because people have cultural differences, dissimilar backgrounds, educational levels, values, believes, and views on religion, as in the possibility with Socrates and Euthyphro. Following the conversation of Socrates and Euthyphro, it is obvious that Socrates is a philosopher who relies on his philosophic point of view and believes that it is not normal to pursue your get father for murder, if he killed a non-relative. But vice versa, it is alright to wring charges against your father, if the victim is a family member. As seen from Socratess proposition I articulate that the man whom your father murdered was one of your relative -- clearly he was for if he had been a stranger you would never have thought of prosecuti ng him. He is not only surprised about Euthyphros desire to sum up his own father to solicit, but is also amazed that religion beliefs aptitude be stronger then the relationship between father and son. On the contrary, Euthypro observes this case from a different point of view. For him it doesnt look, who is the murderer The real principal is whether the murdered man has been justly slain. If justly, then your duty is to let the matter alone but if unjustly, then even if the murderer lives under the analogous table, proceed against him. One can then ask What are the criteria for scholarship of whether the murdered man has been justly or unjustly slain? Socrates was in court awaiting trial on charges of impiety. The philosopher sarcastically agrees to be Euthyphros disciple, when Euthyphro purpose that he has deep knowledge of religion and of things pious and impious. It was important for Socrates to pick up the difference between these terms, as he had to appear in court wi th justification of his actions (rash imagination and innovations in religion). Along their debate, Socrates is little-by-little persuading Euthyphro that the distinction between just and unjust, piety and impiety, honorable and dishonorable is really ambiguous and depends on how it is viewed and by whom it is viewed. Socrates points out that things and actions are not necessarily pious and holy when love by Gods, because even Gods were frequently involved in immoral acts and very often even quarreled with each other.